<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Probabilities in Proofreading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joaoff.com/2009/09/14/probabilities-in-proofreading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joaoff.com/2009/09/14/probabilities-in-proofreading/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=probabilities-in-proofreading</link>
	<description>Programming, Algorithms, and Calculational Mathematics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ouroborus</title>
		<link>http://joaoff.com/2009/09/14/probabilities-in-proofreading/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Ouroborus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joaoff.com/?p=267#comment-239</guid>
		<description>In 1976, this was probably a good answer. Nowadays, we have a peculiar kind of proofreader: The computer. If you have several proofreaders, and you ignore one in these calculations, what effect does this have on the estimate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1976, this was probably a good answer. Nowadays, we have a peculiar kind of proofreader: The computer. If you have several proofreaders, and you ignore one in these calculations, what effect does this have on the estimate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: June Kim</title>
		<link>http://joaoff.com/2009/09/14/probabilities-in-proofreading/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>June Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joaoff.com/?p=267#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Nice piece. This is a well known practice in ecology for estimating population size(and recently in sociology and policy-making for estimating, for example, homeless people). It&#039;s called mark and recapture or capture-recapture.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_and_recapture

There are even some(not many) papers applying this technique to defect estimation in software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice piece. This is a well known practice in ecology for estimating population size(and recently in sociology and policy-making for estimating, for example, homeless people). It&#8217;s called mark and recapture or capture-recapture.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_and_recapture" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_and_recapture</a></p>
<p>There are even some(not many) papers applying this technique to defect estimation in software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Math World &#124; Probabilities in Proofreading : Joao Ferreira</title>
		<link>http://joaoff.com/2009/09/14/probabilities-in-proofreading/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Math World &#124; Probabilities in Proofreading : Joao Ferreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joaoff.com/?p=267#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] View post: Probabilities in Proofreading : Joao Ferreira [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View post: Probabilities in Proofreading : Joao Ferreira [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

